MORE PEACE = MORE PEOPLE = MORE WAR = MORE PEACE = MORE PEOPLE = MORE WAR

Thankfully President Bush is aggressive. The solution seems so simple and yet people want to complicate the simple endeavor of attacking a population who has attacked us on more than one occasion with political apathy and peace!…here is how simple it is: the people responsible for attacking the united states on 9-11 are coincidentally of middle eastern decent , so is it at ALL REMOTELY FEASBLE to create a strategy of retaliation based on this irrefutable evidence ...this of course is sooo politically incorrect, but factually realistic and cannot be IGNORED or DISPUTED = hmmm how can we effectively deploy our military to reflect this undisputed type of information. why couldn't bush just say "we need go to the middle east and take military residence in as many places as possible to prevent any kind of operational or strategic outlets for terrorism to begin." Period. Oh..and while we're there let's hit two birds with one stone..and also solidify our endeavors for oil..(if you don't like it or if you condem this, DON'T DRIVE, you should THANK PRESIDENT BUSH for giving you more of something you need every single day, EVEN IF YOU DON'T WANT IT!!) ..If this ignites more terrorism or is an inconvenience to the Iraqi people it won’t compare to the years of accumulated resentment already residing in the region and it won’t compare to the amount of terrorism created if we do nothing. GEEEZZZ!! HOW SIMPLE IS THAT..and if your contention is war will breed even more terrorism ..then let me stamp out any misinformation with a simple tally -- when 9-11 occurred we were not at war with Iraq nor anyone else!!...so lets tally up the points...AT WAR:zero attacks against the US -- NO WAR:one attack against the US....geez even if we are attacked while at war we are still tied according to the tally!! So a contention that war will breed more terrorism locally in the US is at present moot. As far as suffering in Iraq-- Let me present a hypothetical example …if you only had two choices…would you rather inconvenience yourself with the responsibility of cleaning up a dirty bomb at your local stadium that may or may not have killed your sister who was at the Walgreens across the street or with the inconvenience of an Iraqi family who doesn’t have electricity once again because an IED destroyed the generator next door along with an American humvee and their eldest son. These are both two horrible humanitarian scenarios ..but you can only pick one…if it had to occur which would you pick as your reality??? ….your priority thus becomes more biased ..as an American it should lie first with your family and friends who happen to reside here in this country …and although still a priority, the suffering of the Iraqi people should be put into perspective...this lack of reality hitting home needs to affect us again locally before liberals jump on the "better safe than sorry" bandwagon. I guess 9-11 was not enough suffering for them ..the Iraqi people I guess, take more of a precedence...


THIS COULD BE YOU IF YOU DON'T PARTAKE IN SOME KIND OF AGRESSIVENESS